CU North America Updated 2026-08-20

Cuba Geothermal Screening

Geothermal screening assessment identifies 45.5% prospective land reaching 185°C by 5.5 km depth in Cuba.

Key Geothermal Metrics

Land Reaching 185°C by 5.5 km High Potential
45.5%

Primary baseline screening criterion

Shallowest Depth to 200°C Very Shallow
2.7 km

Minimum drill depth for high enthalpy

Peak Temperature at 5 km Depth Superhot
284.9 °C

Maximum modeled temperature

Typical Geothermal Gradient Volcanic / Rift
60.8 °C/km

Average to 5 km depth (15°C surface)

Grid Connectable Prospective Area High Accessibility
83.5%

Hot territory within 50 km transmission

Stored Heat In-Place (3–7 km) 1 ZJ = 10²¹ Joules
54.6 ZJ

Thermal volume in place (>80°C baseline)

Depth vs. Temperature Matrix (% Land Area)

Proportion of national territory exceeding target isotherm at specified depth

0.1° Inversion Grid
Isotherm 3.0 km 4.0 km 5.0 km 6.0 km 7.0 km 8.0 km
150°C 14.1% 35.9% 47.4% 75.3% 96.8% 100%
175°C 10.5% 25% 42.3% 60.4% 81.3% 87.4%
200°C 9.1% 22.6% 36.8% 54.6% 66.4% 86%
225°C 7.7% 21.1% 31.2% 37.6% 53.2% 60.3%
250°C 6.1% 14.7% 24% 32.9% 45.1% 54.2%

4-Stage Geothermal Resource & Infrastructure Funnel

Progressive screening from gross national territory down to grid-connected & populated prospective zones

1 Whole country
109 884 km² 100%
2 Reaches 185°C by 5.5 km
49 997 km² 45.5%
3 ...and within 50 km transmission
41 747 km² 38%
4 ...and within 100 km town
36 100 km² 35.7%

Geological Setting & Subsurface Parameters

Lithology, basement thickness, stress and thermal boundary constraints

Median Depth to 200°C Isotherm 4.7 km
Best 10th Percentile Depth to 200°C 3.8 km
Median Temperature at 5 km Depth 225.6 °C
Best 10th Percentile Temp at 5 km 247.9 °C
Median Sediment Thickness 0.2 km
Sediment / Hard-Rock Well Share 31.7%
Territory Under 1 km Sediment Cover 93.7%
Lithostatic Pressure at 5 km Depth 139.6 MPa
Moho Crustal Discontinuity Depth 37.4 km
Thermal Lithosphere Thickness 96.8 km
Curie Temperature Isotherm Depth 16.9 km
Model Temperature Spread Uncertainty (200°C) ±0.9 km

Transmission Grid & Demand Colocation

Infrastructure interconnectivity and urban power demand proximity

High-Voltage Transmission Network Length 14 019 km
Land Area Within 25 km of Grid 69.8%
Land Area Within 50 km of Grid 83.5%
Land Area Within 100 km of Grid 89.6%
Average Proximity to Nearest Substation / Line 31.9 km
Urban Centers (>10,000 Population) 45
Total Urban Population 12 M
Prospective Resource Colocated Near Demand (>1M Pop) 59%

Target Sensitivity & Deep EGS Upside

Sensitivity of prospective resource area to adjusted depth and temperature thresholds

150°C Baseline at 5.5 km 72.8% of national territory reaches 150°C at 5.5 km depth
185°C Baseline at 7.5 km 81.9% of national territory reaches 185°C at 7.5 km depth

Global Peer Benchmarking (vs. 278 Assessed Jurisdictions)

Relative ranking distribution of Cuba across 11 standardized geothermal indicators

Cuba Rank Global Peer Spread
Shallowest 200°C depth
2.7 km Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 76th percentile
Peak temp at 5 km
284.9 °C Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 74th percentile
Prospective land area (>185°C at 5.5 km)
45.5% Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 76th percentile
Stored heat in-place (3-7 km)
54.6 ZJ Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 54th percentile
Typical geothermal gradient
60.8 °C/km Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 87th percentile
Grid proximity (<50 km)
83.5% Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 84th percentile
Thin sediment coverage (<1 km)
93.7% Top 10%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 94th percentile
Curie isotherm depth
16.9 km Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 63th percentile
Moho crustal thickness
37.4 km Lower 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 33th percentile
Model temperature uncertainty spread
±0.8 km Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 78th percentile
Urban demand colocation
27.9% Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 64th percentile
Asset-Level 3D Simulation Available

Need Interactive 3D Spatial Inversion for Cuba?

High-resolution 3D temperature cubes, localized Curie depth inversions, fault network stress tensors, and drilling capex curves for Cuba are accessible through our Premium & Enterprise subscription tiers.

Direct Founder Contact: founders@geothermalradar.com

Analytical Geothermal Assessment & Discussion: Cuba

Subsurface thermal interpretation, model uncertainty, infrastructure colocation, and resource quality analysis

Resource Overview

Geothermal assessment for Cuba indicates volcanic_arc geological controls governing subsurface heat transport, yielding 45.5% of land area reaching the baseline target of 185°C at 5.5 km depth.

Uncertainty & Model Variance

Thermal inversion across Cuba shows consistent model convergence with constrained standard deviations across deep crustal layers.

Grid & Infrastructure Colocation

National electrical transmission coverage positions approximately 83.5% of prospective geothermal ground within 50 km of existing high-voltage corridors.

Geological & Basement Setting

Subsurface lithology is characterized by volcanic arc dynamics with median sediment thickness of 0.2 km and crustal thickness of 37.4 km.

Stored Heat Volume

Accessible thermal energy in place between 3 km and 7 km depth above 80°C totals 54.6 Zettajoules (ZJ).

Peer Comparison

Benchmarked against 237 global assessment jurisdictions, Cuba demonstrates competitive positioning across heat flow, infrastructure, and basement competence indicators.

Target Sensitivity Analysis

Screening at 150°C baseline at 5.5 km increases prospective territory, demonstrating substantial deep EGS resource headroom.

Screening Methodology, Parameters & Limitations

This screening assessment for Cuba is generated from Geothermal Radar Data Pack 2026.1 utilizing global 0.1° hex-grid thermal inversion across 1 221 model cells (land area: 109 884 km²). Baseline prospective criterion is defined as reaching 185°C at or above 5.5 km depth with surface temperature normalized to 15°C.

  • Screening estimates represent regional-scale heat in place and do not replace localized 3D seismic or exploratory drilling.
  • Model uncertainties expand in regions with sparse deep boreholes and complex thrust fault kinematics.
  • Grid proximity indicators reflect line-of-sight distance to high-voltage transmission and do not account for local substation thermal capacity.
Need Detailed Asset-Level Due Diligence?

Access 3D temperature grids, drilling cost curves, and micro-siting GIS layers.

Request Full Technical Dossier