RW Africa Updated 2026-08-20

Rwanda Geothermal Screening

Geothermal screening assessment identifies 37% prospective land reaching 185°C by 5.5 km depth in Rwanda.

Key Geothermal Metrics

Land Reaching 185°C by 5.5 km High Potential
37%

Primary baseline screening criterion

Shallowest Depth to 200°C Very Shallow
1.9 km

Minimum drill depth for high enthalpy

Peak Temperature at 5 km Depth Superhot
349.7 °C

Maximum modeled temperature

Typical Geothermal Gradient Volcanic / Rift
59.3 °C/km

Average to 5 km depth (15°C surface)

Grid Connectable Prospective Area High Accessibility
84.5%

Hot territory within 50 km transmission

Stored Heat In-Place (3–7 km) 1 ZJ = 10²¹ Joules
23.4 ZJ

Thermal volume in place (>80°C baseline)

Depth vs. Temperature Matrix (% Land Area)

Proportion of national territory exceeding target isotherm at specified depth

0.1° Inversion Grid
Isotherm 3.0 km 4.0 km 5.0 km 6.0 km 7.0 km 8.0 km
150°C 20% 31.6% 50.8% 76% 99% 100%
175°C 13.2% 28.2% 49.4% 66% 85.6% 100%
200°C 11.3% 28.9% 44.3% 65.1% 75.2% 100%
225°C 10.1% 23.6% 39.7% 57.4% 72.5% 73.8%
250°C 8.7% 18.4% 34% 43.5% 64.9% 72.5%

4-Stage Geothermal Resource & Infrastructure Funnel

Progressive screening from gross national territory down to grid-connected & populated prospective zones

1 Whole country
26 338 km² 100%
2 Reaches 185°C by 5.5 km
9 745 km² 37%
3 ...and within 50 km transmission
8 235 km² 31.3%
4 ...and within 100 km town
7 238 km² 29.2%

Geological Setting & Subsurface Parameters

Lithology, basement thickness, stress and thermal boundary constraints

Median Depth to 200°C Isotherm 4.6 km
Best 10th Percentile Depth to 200°C 2.9 km
Median Temperature at 5 km Depth 241.2 °C
Best 10th Percentile Temp at 5 km 305.2 °C
Median Sediment Thickness 0.2 km
Sediment / Hard-Rock Well Share 10.8%
Territory Under 1 km Sediment Cover 91.8%
Lithostatic Pressure at 5 km Depth 132.9 MPa
Moho Crustal Discontinuity Depth 36 km
Thermal Lithosphere Thickness 81.3 km
Curie Temperature Isotherm Depth 13 km
Model Temperature Spread Uncertainty (200°C) ±1.4 km

Transmission Grid & Demand Colocation

Infrastructure interconnectivity and urban power demand proximity

High-Voltage Transmission Network Length 2 777 km
Land Area Within 25 km of Grid 68.7%
Land Area Within 50 km of Grid 84.5%
Land Area Within 100 km of Grid 89.1%
Average Proximity to Nearest Substation / Line 21.4 km
Urban Centers (>10,000 Population) 21
Total Urban Population 6.7 M
Prospective Resource Colocated Near Demand (>1M Pop) 66.7%

Target Sensitivity & Deep EGS Upside

Sensitivity of prospective resource area to adjusted depth and temperature thresholds

150°C Baseline at 5.5 km 59.2% of national territory reaches 150°C at 5.5 km depth
185°C Baseline at 7.5 km 66.6% of national territory reaches 185°C at 7.5 km depth

Global Peer Benchmarking (vs. 278 Assessed Jurisdictions)

Relative ranking distribution of Rwanda across 11 standardized geothermal indicators

Rwanda Rank Global Peer Spread
Shallowest 200°C depth
1.9 km Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 87th percentile
Peak temp at 5 km
349.7 °C Top 10%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 99th percentile
Prospective land area (>185°C at 5.5 km)
37% Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 62th percentile
Stored heat in-place (3-7 km)
23.4 ZJ Lower 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 43th percentile
Typical geothermal gradient
59.3 °C/km Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 85th percentile
Grid proximity (<50 km)
84.5% Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 84th percentile
Thin sediment coverage (<1 km)
91.8% Top 10%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 92th percentile
Curie isotherm depth
13 km Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 71th percentile
Moho crustal thickness
36 km Lower 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 35th percentile
Model temperature uncertainty spread
±0.7 km Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 77th percentile
Urban demand colocation
76.1% Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 79th percentile
Asset-Level 3D Simulation Available

Need Interactive 3D Spatial Inversion for Rwanda?

High-resolution 3D temperature cubes, localized Curie depth inversions, fault network stress tensors, and drilling capex curves for Rwanda are accessible through our Premium & Enterprise subscription tiers.

Direct Founder Contact: founders@geothermalradar.com

Analytical Geothermal Assessment & Discussion: Rwanda

Subsurface thermal interpretation, model uncertainty, infrastructure colocation, and resource quality analysis

Resource Overview

Geothermal assessment for Rwanda indicates rift_volcanic geological controls governing subsurface heat transport, yielding 37% of land area reaching the baseline target of 185°C at 5.5 km depth.

Uncertainty & Model Variance

Thermal inversion across Rwanda shows consistent model convergence with constrained standard deviations across deep crustal layers.

Grid & Infrastructure Colocation

National electrical transmission coverage positions approximately 84.5% of prospective geothermal ground within 50 km of existing high-voltage corridors.

Geological & Basement Setting

Subsurface lithology is characterized by rift volcanic dynamics with median sediment thickness of 0.2 km and crustal thickness of 36 km.

Stored Heat Volume

Accessible thermal energy in place between 3 km and 7 km depth above 80°C totals 23.4 Zettajoules (ZJ).

Peer Comparison

Benchmarked against 237 global assessment jurisdictions, Rwanda demonstrates competitive positioning across heat flow, infrastructure, and basement competence indicators.

Target Sensitivity Analysis

Screening at 150°C baseline at 5.5 km increases prospective territory, demonstrating substantial deep EGS resource headroom.

Screening Methodology, Parameters & Limitations

This screening assessment for Rwanda is generated from Geothermal Radar Data Pack 2026.1 utilizing global 0.1° hex-grid thermal inversion across 293 model cells (land area: 26 338 km²). Baseline prospective criterion is defined as reaching 185°C at or above 5.5 km depth with surface temperature normalized to 15°C.

  • Screening estimates represent regional-scale heat in place and do not replace localized 3D seismic or exploratory drilling.
  • Model uncertainties expand in regions with sparse deep boreholes and complex thrust fault kinematics.
  • Grid proximity indicators reflect line-of-sight distance to high-voltage transmission and do not account for local substation thermal capacity.
Need Detailed Asset-Level Due Diligence?

Access 3D temperature grids, drilling cost curves, and micro-siting GIS layers.

Request Full Technical Dossier