ET Africa Updated 2026-08-20

Ethiopia Geothermal Screening

Geothermal screening assessment identifies 66.5% prospective land reaching 185°C by 5.5 km depth in Ethiopia.

Key Geothermal Metrics

Land Reaching 185°C by 5.5 km High Potential
66.5%

Primary baseline screening criterion

Shallowest Depth to 200°C Very Shallow
1.7 km

Minimum drill depth for high enthalpy

Peak Temperature at 5 km Depth Superhot
291.7 °C

Maximum modeled temperature

Typical Geothermal Gradient Volcanic / Rift
57.2 °C/km

Average to 5 km depth (15°C surface)

Grid Connectable Prospective Area Moderate Distance
76.9%

Hot territory within 50 km transmission

Stored Heat In-Place (3–7 km) 1 ZJ = 10²¹ Joules
528 ZJ

Thermal volume in place (>80°C baseline)

Depth vs. Temperature Matrix (% Land Area)

Proportion of national territory exceeding target isotherm at specified depth

0.1° Inversion Grid
Isotherm 3.0 km 4.0 km 5.0 km 6.0 km 7.0 km 8.0 km
150°C 24.4% 53.5% 76.6% 98% 99% 100%
175°C 22.9% 36.8% 68.5% 88.6% 99% 100%
200°C 13.4% 34.5% 58.2% 77.2% 99% 100%
225°C 11.2% 28.6% 46.5% 67.9% 83.6% 98.8%
250°C 10.3% 23.9% 33.7% 45% 71.9% 77.4%

4-Stage Geothermal Resource & Infrastructure Funnel

Progressive screening from gross national territory down to grid-connected & populated prospective zones

1 Whole country
1 104 300 km² 100%
2 Reaches 185°C by 5.5 km
734 360 km² 66.5%
3 ...and within 50 km transmission
564 723 km² 51.1%
4 ...and within 100 km town
501 664 km² 45.8%

Geological Setting & Subsurface Parameters

Lithology, basement thickness, stress and thermal boundary constraints

Median Depth to 200°C Isotherm 4.7 km
Best 10th Percentile Depth to 200°C 2.7 km
Median Temperature at 5 km Depth 214.2 °C
Best 10th Percentile Temp at 5 km 266.1 °C
Median Sediment Thickness 0.3 km
Sediment / Hard-Rock Well Share 15.3%
Territory Under 1 km Sediment Cover 83.2%
Lithostatic Pressure at 5 km Depth 139.6 MPa
Moho Crustal Discontinuity Depth 33.5 km
Thermal Lithosphere Thickness 100.5 km
Curie Temperature Isotherm Depth 11.6 km
Model Temperature Spread Uncertainty (200°C) ±0.8 km

Transmission Grid & Demand Colocation

Infrastructure interconnectivity and urban power demand proximity

High-Voltage Transmission Network Length 32 655 km
Land Area Within 25 km of Grid 65.1%
Land Area Within 50 km of Grid 76.9%
Land Area Within 100 km of Grid 82.9%
Average Proximity to Nearest Substation / Line 23.5 km
Urban Centers (>10,000 Population) 232
Total Urban Population 18.9 M
Prospective Resource Colocated Near Demand (>1M Pop) 36.3%

Target Sensitivity & Deep EGS Upside

Sensitivity of prospective resource area to adjusted depth and temperature thresholds

150°C Baseline at 5.5 km 98% of national territory reaches 150°C at 5.5 km depth
185°C Baseline at 7.5 km 99% of national territory reaches 185°C at 7.5 km depth

Global Peer Benchmarking (vs. 278 Assessed Jurisdictions)

Relative ranking distribution of Ethiopia across 11 standardized geothermal indicators

Ethiopia Rank Global Peer Spread
Shallowest 200°C depth
1.7 km Top 10%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 90th percentile
Peak temp at 5 km
291.7 °C Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 77th percentile
Prospective land area (>185°C at 5.5 km)
66.5% Top 10%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 99th percentile
Stored heat in-place (3-7 km)
528 ZJ Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 85th percentile
Typical geothermal gradient
57.2 °C/km Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 82th percentile
Grid proximity (<50 km)
76.9% Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 77th percentile
Thin sediment coverage (<1 km)
83.2% Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 83th percentile
Curie isotherm depth
11.6 km Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 74th percentile
Moho crustal thickness
33.5 km Lower 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 40th percentile
Model temperature uncertainty spread
±1.7 km Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 63th percentile
Urban demand colocation
36.9% Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 90th percentile
Asset-Level 3D Simulation Available

Need Interactive 3D Spatial Inversion for Ethiopia?

High-resolution 3D temperature cubes, localized Curie depth inversions, fault network stress tensors, and drilling capex curves for Ethiopia are accessible through our Premium & Enterprise subscription tiers.

Direct Founder Contact: founders@geothermalradar.com

Analytical Geothermal Assessment & Discussion: Ethiopia

Subsurface thermal interpretation, model uncertainty, infrastructure colocation, and resource quality analysis

Resource Overview

Geothermal assessment for Ethiopia indicates rift_volcanic geological controls governing subsurface heat transport, yielding 66.5% of land area reaching the baseline target of 185°C at 5.5 km depth.

Uncertainty & Model Variance

Thermal inversion across Ethiopia shows consistent model convergence with constrained standard deviations across deep crustal layers.

Grid & Infrastructure Colocation

National electrical transmission coverage positions approximately 76.9% of prospective geothermal ground within 50 km of existing high-voltage corridors.

Geological & Basement Setting

Subsurface lithology is characterized by rift volcanic dynamics with median sediment thickness of 0.3 km and crustal thickness of 33.5 km.

Stored Heat Volume

Accessible thermal energy in place between 3 km and 7 km depth above 80°C totals 528 Zettajoules (ZJ).

Peer Comparison

Benchmarked against 237 global assessment jurisdictions, Ethiopia demonstrates competitive positioning across heat flow, infrastructure, and basement competence indicators.

Target Sensitivity Analysis

Screening at 150°C baseline at 5.5 km increases prospective territory, demonstrating substantial deep EGS resource headroom.

Screening Methodology, Parameters & Limitations

This screening assessment for Ethiopia is generated from Geothermal Radar Data Pack 2026.1 utilizing global 0.1° hex-grid thermal inversion across 12 270 model cells (land area: 1 104 300 km²). Baseline prospective criterion is defined as reaching 185°C at or above 5.5 km depth with surface temperature normalized to 15°C.

  • Screening estimates represent regional-scale heat in place and do not replace localized 3D seismic or exploratory drilling.
  • Model uncertainties expand in regions with sparse deep boreholes and complex thrust fault kinematics.
  • Grid proximity indicators reflect line-of-sight distance to high-voltage transmission and do not account for local substation thermal capacity.
Need Detailed Asset-Level Due Diligence?

Access 3D temperature grids, drilling cost curves, and micro-siting GIS layers.

Request Full Technical Dossier