PN Asia Pacific Updated 2026-08-20

Pitcairn Geothermal Screening

Geothermal screening assessment identifies 33.5% prospective land reaching 185°C by 5.5 km depth in Pitcairn.

Key Geothermal Metrics

Land Reaching 185°C by 5.5 km High Potential
33.5%

Primary baseline screening criterion

Shallowest Depth to 200°C Shallow
3.2 km

Minimum drill depth for high enthalpy

Peak Temperature at 5 km Depth Superhot
293.4 °C

Maximum modeled temperature

Typical Geothermal Gradient Volcanic / Rift
59 °C/km

Average to 5 km depth (15°C surface)

Grid Connectable Prospective Area Moderate Distance
79.6%

Hot territory within 50 km transmission

Stored Heat In-Place (3–7 km) 1 ZJ = 10²¹ Joules
105.9 ZJ

Thermal volume in place (>80°C baseline)

Depth vs. Temperature Matrix (% Land Area)

Proportion of national territory exceeding target isotherm at specified depth

0.1° Inversion Grid
Isotherm 3.0 km 4.0 km 5.0 km 6.0 km 7.0 km 8.0 km
150°C 13.1% 23.9% 36.6% 49% 72.4% 85.9%
175°C 8.3% 23.2% 32.7% 46.8% 61.6% 73.2%
200°C 7.1% 18.8% 28.4% 43% 45.7% 64.9%
225°C 6.8% 14.5% 22.5% 33.7% 44% 46.2%
250°C 5.3% 10.5% 18.3% 25.8% 36.5% 39.4%

4-Stage Geothermal Resource & Infrastructure Funnel

Progressive screening from gross national territory down to grid-connected & populated prospective zones

1 Whole country
47 km² 100%
2 Reaches 185°C by 5.5 km
16 km² 33.5%
3 ...and within 50 km transmission
13 km² 26.7%
4 ...and within 100 km town
11 km² 24.7%

Geological Setting & Subsurface Parameters

Lithology, basement thickness, stress and thermal boundary constraints

Median Depth to 200°C Isotherm 5.4 km
Best 10th Percentile Depth to 200°C 4.2 km
Median Temperature at 5 km Depth 225.1 °C
Best 10th Percentile Temp at 5 km 257.4 °C
Median Sediment Thickness 0.5 km
Sediment / Hard-Rock Well Share 18%
Territory Under 1 km Sediment Cover 92.5%
Lithostatic Pressure at 5 km Depth 141.2 MPa
Moho Crustal Discontinuity Depth 46.9 km
Thermal Lithosphere Thickness 116.8 km
Curie Temperature Isotherm Depth 15.9 km
Model Temperature Spread Uncertainty (200°C) ±1.5 km

Transmission Grid & Demand Colocation

Infrastructure interconnectivity and urban power demand proximity

High-Voltage Transmission Network Length 177 km
Land Area Within 25 km of Grid 62%
Land Area Within 50 km of Grid 79.6%
Land Area Within 100 km of Grid 86.5%
Average Proximity to Nearest Substation / Line 14.7 km
Urban Centers (>10,000 Population) 5
Total Urban Population 0.2 M
Prospective Resource Colocated Near Demand (>1M Pop) 47.8%

Target Sensitivity & Deep EGS Upside

Sensitivity of prospective resource area to adjusted depth and temperature thresholds

150°C Baseline at 5.5 km 53.6% of national territory reaches 150°C at 5.5 km depth
185°C Baseline at 7.5 km 60.3% of national territory reaches 185°C at 7.5 km depth

Global Peer Benchmarking (vs. 278 Assessed Jurisdictions)

Relative ranking distribution of Pitcairn across 11 standardized geothermal indicators

Pitcairn Rank Global Peer Spread
Shallowest 200°C depth
3.2 km Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 69th percentile
Peak temp at 5 km
293.4 °C Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 77th percentile
Prospective land area (>185°C at 5.5 km)
33.5% Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 56th percentile
Stored heat in-place (3-7 km)
105.9 ZJ Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 63th percentile
Typical geothermal gradient
59 °C/km Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 84th percentile
Grid proximity (<50 km)
79.6% Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 80th percentile
Thin sediment coverage (<1 km)
92.5% Top 10%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 92th percentile
Curie isotherm depth
15.9 km Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 65th percentile
Moho crustal thickness
46.9 km Lower 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 16th percentile
Model temperature uncertainty spread
±1 km Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 71th percentile
Urban demand colocation
36.7% Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 79th percentile
Asset-Level 3D Simulation Available

Need Interactive 3D Spatial Inversion for Pitcairn?

High-resolution 3D temperature cubes, localized Curie depth inversions, fault network stress tensors, and drilling capex curves for Pitcairn are accessible through our Premium & Enterprise subscription tiers.

Direct Founder Contact: founders@geothermalradar.com

Analytical Geothermal Assessment & Discussion: Pitcairn

Subsurface thermal interpretation, model uncertainty, infrastructure colocation, and resource quality analysis

Resource Overview

Geothermal assessment for Pitcairn indicates volcanic_arc geological controls governing subsurface heat transport, yielding 33.5% of land area reaching the baseline target of 185°C at 5.5 km depth.

Uncertainty & Model Variance

Thermal inversion across Pitcairn shows consistent model convergence with constrained standard deviations across deep crustal layers.

Grid & Infrastructure Colocation

National electrical transmission coverage positions approximately 79.6% of prospective geothermal ground within 50 km of existing high-voltage corridors.

Geological & Basement Setting

Subsurface lithology is characterized by volcanic arc dynamics with median sediment thickness of 0.5 km and crustal thickness of 46.9 km.

Stored Heat Volume

Accessible thermal energy in place between 3 km and 7 km depth above 80°C totals 105.9 Zettajoules (ZJ).

Peer Comparison

Benchmarked against 237 global assessment jurisdictions, Pitcairn demonstrates competitive positioning across heat flow, infrastructure, and basement competence indicators.

Target Sensitivity Analysis

Screening at 150°C baseline at 5.5 km increases prospective territory, demonstrating substantial deep EGS resource headroom.

Screening Methodology, Parameters & Limitations

This screening assessment for Pitcairn is generated from Geothermal Radar Data Pack 2026.1 utilizing global 0.1° hex-grid thermal inversion across 1 model cells (land area: 47 km²). Baseline prospective criterion is defined as reaching 185°C at or above 5.5 km depth with surface temperature normalized to 15°C.

  • Screening estimates represent regional-scale heat in place and do not replace localized 3D seismic or exploratory drilling.
  • Model uncertainties expand in regions with sparse deep boreholes and complex thrust fault kinematics.
  • Grid proximity indicators reflect line-of-sight distance to high-voltage transmission and do not account for local substation thermal capacity.
Need Detailed Asset-Level Due Diligence?

Access 3D temperature grids, drilling cost curves, and micro-siting GIS layers.

Request Full Technical Dossier