PG Asia Pacific Updated 2026-08-20

Papua New Guinea Geothermal Screening

Geothermal screening assessment identifies 44.4% prospective land reaching 185°C by 5.5 km depth in Papua New Guinea.

Key Geothermal Metrics

Land Reaching 185°C by 5.5 km High Potential
44.4%

Primary baseline screening criterion

Shallowest Depth to 200°C Shallow
3.5 km

Minimum drill depth for high enthalpy

Peak Temperature at 5 km Depth Commercial EGS
273.9 °C

Maximum modeled temperature

Typical Geothermal Gradient Volcanic / Rift
58.1 °C/km

Average to 5 km depth (15°C surface)

Grid Connectable Prospective Area High Accessibility
81.6%

Hot territory within 50 km transmission

Stored Heat In-Place (3–7 km) 1 ZJ = 10²¹ Joules
198.9 ZJ

Thermal volume in place (>80°C baseline)

Depth vs. Temperature Matrix (% Land Area)

Proportion of national territory exceeding target isotherm at specified depth

0.1° Inversion Grid
Isotherm 3.0 km 4.0 km 5.0 km 6.0 km 7.0 km 8.0 km
150°C 12% 25.7% 45.3% 65% 91.4% 100%
175°C 11.7% 27.8% 39.8% 53.4% 73.8% 90.8%
200°C 11.1% 21.6% 35.7% 42.4% 54.6% 69.5%
225°C 7.6% 17.3% 27% 36.4% 46.6% 51.1%
250°C 5.4% 13.9% 17.9% 27.4% 33.3% 43.1%

4-Stage Geothermal Resource & Infrastructure Funnel

Progressive screening from gross national territory down to grid-connected & populated prospective zones

1 Whole country
462 840 km² 100%
2 Reaches 185°C by 5.5 km
205 501 km² 44.4%
3 ...and within 50 km transmission
167 689 km² 36.2%
4 ...and within 100 km town
144 999 km² 34.1%

Geological Setting & Subsurface Parameters

Lithology, basement thickness, stress and thermal boundary constraints

Median Depth to 200°C Isotherm 6.4 km
Best 10th Percentile Depth to 200°C 3.9 km
Median Temperature at 5 km Depth 197.6 °C
Best 10th Percentile Temp at 5 km 243.5 °C
Median Sediment Thickness 0.2 km
Sediment / Hard-Rock Well Share 37.2%
Territory Under 1 km Sediment Cover 81.6%
Lithostatic Pressure at 5 km Depth 141.7 MPa
Moho Crustal Discontinuity Depth 33.4 km
Thermal Lithosphere Thickness 84.4 km
Curie Temperature Isotherm Depth 14.5 km
Model Temperature Spread Uncertainty (200°C) ±1.3 km

Transmission Grid & Demand Colocation

Infrastructure interconnectivity and urban power demand proximity

High-Voltage Transmission Network Length 26 125 km
Land Area Within 25 km of Grid 61.3%
Land Area Within 50 km of Grid 81.6%
Land Area Within 100 km of Grid 89.1%
Average Proximity to Nearest Substation / Line 27.1 km
Urban Centers (>10,000 Population) 196
Total Urban Population 26 M
Prospective Resource Colocated Near Demand (>1M Pop) 51.4%

Target Sensitivity & Deep EGS Upside

Sensitivity of prospective resource area to adjusted depth and temperature thresholds

150°C Baseline at 5.5 km 71% of national territory reaches 150°C at 5.5 km depth
185°C Baseline at 7.5 km 79.9% of national territory reaches 185°C at 7.5 km depth

Global Peer Benchmarking (vs. 278 Assessed Jurisdictions)

Relative ranking distribution of Papua New Guinea across 11 standardized geothermal indicators

Papua New Guinea Rank Global Peer Spread
Shallowest 200°C depth
3.5 km Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 64th percentile
Peak temp at 5 km
273.9 °C Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 70th percentile
Prospective land area (>185°C at 5.5 km)
44.4% Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 74th percentile
Stored heat in-place (3-7 km)
198.9 ZJ Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 72th percentile
Typical geothermal gradient
58.1 °C/km Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 83th percentile
Grid proximity (<50 km)
81.6% Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 82th percentile
Thin sediment coverage (<1 km)
81.6% Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 82th percentile
Curie isotherm depth
14.5 km Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 68th percentile
Moho crustal thickness
33.4 km Lower 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 40th percentile
Model temperature uncertainty spread
±1.8 km Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 74th percentile
Urban demand colocation
67.7% Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 72th percentile
Asset-Level 3D Simulation Available

Need Interactive 3D Spatial Inversion for Papua New Guinea?

High-resolution 3D temperature cubes, localized Curie depth inversions, fault network stress tensors, and drilling capex curves for Papua New Guinea are accessible through our Premium & Enterprise subscription tiers.

Direct Founder Contact: founders@geothermalradar.com

Analytical Geothermal Assessment & Discussion: Papua New Guinea

Subsurface thermal interpretation, model uncertainty, infrastructure colocation, and resource quality analysis

Resource Overview

Geothermal assessment for Papua New Guinea indicates volcanic_arc geological controls governing subsurface heat transport, yielding 44.4% of land area reaching the baseline target of 185°C at 5.5 km depth.

Uncertainty & Model Variance

Thermal inversion across Papua New Guinea shows consistent model convergence with constrained standard deviations across deep crustal layers.

Grid & Infrastructure Colocation

National electrical transmission coverage positions approximately 81.6% of prospective geothermal ground within 50 km of existing high-voltage corridors.

Geological & Basement Setting

Subsurface lithology is characterized by volcanic arc dynamics with median sediment thickness of 0.2 km and crustal thickness of 33.4 km.

Stored Heat Volume

Accessible thermal energy in place between 3 km and 7 km depth above 80°C totals 198.9 Zettajoules (ZJ).

Peer Comparison

Benchmarked against 237 global assessment jurisdictions, Papua New Guinea demonstrates competitive positioning across heat flow, infrastructure, and basement competence indicators.

Target Sensitivity Analysis

Screening at 150°C baseline at 5.5 km increases prospective territory, demonstrating substantial deep EGS resource headroom.

Screening Methodology, Parameters & Limitations

This screening assessment for Papua New Guinea is generated from Geothermal Radar Data Pack 2026.1 utilizing global 0.1° hex-grid thermal inversion across 5 143 model cells (land area: 462 840 km²). Baseline prospective criterion is defined as reaching 185°C at or above 5.5 km depth with surface temperature normalized to 15°C.

  • Screening estimates represent regional-scale heat in place and do not replace localized 3D seismic or exploratory drilling.
  • Model uncertainties expand in regions with sparse deep boreholes and complex thrust fault kinematics.
  • Grid proximity indicators reflect line-of-sight distance to high-voltage transmission and do not account for local substation thermal capacity.
Need Detailed Asset-Level Due Diligence?

Access 3D temperature grids, drilling cost curves, and micro-siting GIS layers.

Request Full Technical Dossier