MN Asia Pacific Updated 2026-08-20

Mongolia Geothermal Screening

Geothermal screening assessment identifies 18.5% prospective land reaching 185°C by 5.5 km depth in Mongolia.

Key Geothermal Metrics

Land Reaching 185°C by 5.5 km Moderate
18.5%

Primary baseline screening criterion

Shallowest Depth to 200°C Deep Target
4.9 km

Minimum drill depth for high enthalpy

Peak Temperature at 5 km Depth Direct Heat
198.6 °C

Maximum modeled temperature

Typical Geothermal Gradient Elevated
43.2 °C/km

Average to 5 km depth (15°C surface)

Grid Connectable Prospective Area High Accessibility
80.7%

Hot territory within 50 km transmission

Stored Heat In-Place (3–7 km) 1 ZJ = 10²¹ Joules
484.4 ZJ

Thermal volume in place (>80°C baseline)

Depth vs. Temperature Matrix (% Land Area)

Proportion of national territory exceeding target isotherm at specified depth

0.1° Inversion Grid
Isotherm 3.0 km 4.0 km 5.0 km 6.0 km 7.0 km 8.0 km
150°C 3.9% 7.1% 10.6% 14.2% 19.8% 22.7%
175°C 2.6% 5.7% 8.1% 10.7% 15.8% 18.3%
200°C 1.6% 3.9% 5.9% 8% 9.9% 12.7%
225°C 1% 1.8% 2.8% 3.6% 4.8% 5.2%
250°C

4-Stage Geothermal Resource & Infrastructure Funnel

Progressive screening from gross national territory down to grid-connected & populated prospective zones

1 Whole country
1 564 116 km² 100%
2 Reaches 185°C by 5.5 km
289 361 km² 18.5%
3 ...and within 50 km transmission
233 514 km² 14.9%
4 ...and within 100 km town
202 523 km² 13.5%

Geological Setting & Subsurface Parameters

Lithology, basement thickness, stress and thermal boundary constraints

Median Depth to 200°C Isotherm 7.5 km
Best 10th Percentile Depth to 200°C 5.7 km
Median Temperature at 5 km Depth 160.7 °C
Best 10th Percentile Temp at 5 km 177.4 °C
Median Sediment Thickness 1.7 km
Sediment / Hard-Rock Well Share 23.8%
Territory Under 1 km Sediment Cover 66.4%
Lithostatic Pressure at 5 km Depth 132.7 MPa
Moho Crustal Discontinuity Depth 36.7 km
Thermal Lithosphere Thickness 104.6 km
Curie Temperature Isotherm Depth 21.7 km
Model Temperature Spread Uncertainty (200°C) ±1 km

Transmission Grid & Demand Colocation

Infrastructure interconnectivity and urban power demand proximity

High-Voltage Transmission Network Length 26 426 km
Land Area Within 25 km of Grid 70.9%
Land Area Within 50 km of Grid 80.7%
Land Area Within 100 km of Grid 90.5%
Average Proximity to Nearest Substation / Line 26.3 km
Urban Centers (>10,000 Population) 204
Total Urban Population 39.8 M
Prospective Resource Colocated Near Demand (>1M Pop) 71.6%

Target Sensitivity & Deep EGS Upside

Sensitivity of prospective resource area to adjusted depth and temperature thresholds

150°C Baseline at 5.5 km 29.6% of national territory reaches 150°C at 5.5 km depth
185°C Baseline at 7.5 km 33.3% of national territory reaches 185°C at 7.5 km depth

Global Peer Benchmarking (vs. 278 Assessed Jurisdictions)

Relative ranking distribution of Mongolia across 11 standardized geothermal indicators

Mongolia Rank Global Peer Spread
Shallowest 200°C depth
4.9 km Lower 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 44th percentile
Peak temp at 5 km
198.6 °C Lower 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 39th percentile
Prospective land area (>185°C at 5.5 km)
18.5% Lower 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 31th percentile
Stored heat in-place (3-7 km)
484.4 ZJ Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 84th percentile
Typical geothermal gradient
43.2 °C/km Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 62th percentile
Grid proximity (<50 km)
80.7% Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 81th percentile
Thin sediment coverage (<1 km)
66.4% Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 66th percentile
Curie isotherm depth
21.7 km Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 52th percentile
Moho crustal thickness
36.7 km Lower 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 34th percentile
Model temperature uncertainty spread
±1 km Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 61th percentile
Urban demand colocation
74.7% Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 62th percentile
Asset-Level 3D Simulation Available

Need Interactive 3D Spatial Inversion for Mongolia?

High-resolution 3D temperature cubes, localized Curie depth inversions, fault network stress tensors, and drilling capex curves for Mongolia are accessible through our Premium & Enterprise subscription tiers.

Direct Founder Contact: founders@geothermalradar.com

Analytical Geothermal Assessment & Discussion: Mongolia

Subsurface thermal interpretation, model uncertainty, infrastructure colocation, and resource quality analysis

Resource Overview

Geothermal assessment for Mongolia indicates extensional_basin geological controls governing subsurface heat transport, yielding 18.5% of land area reaching the baseline target of 185°C at 5.5 km depth.

Uncertainty & Model Variance

Thermal inversion across Mongolia shows consistent model convergence with constrained standard deviations across deep crustal layers.

Grid & Infrastructure Colocation

National electrical transmission coverage positions approximately 80.7% of prospective geothermal ground within 50 km of existing high-voltage corridors.

Geological & Basement Setting

Subsurface lithology is characterized by extensional basin dynamics with median sediment thickness of 1.7 km and crustal thickness of 36.7 km.

Stored Heat Volume

Accessible thermal energy in place between 3 km and 7 km depth above 80°C totals 484.4 Zettajoules (ZJ).

Peer Comparison

Benchmarked against 237 global assessment jurisdictions, Mongolia demonstrates competitive positioning across heat flow, infrastructure, and basement competence indicators.

Target Sensitivity Analysis

Screening at 150°C baseline at 5.5 km increases prospective territory, demonstrating substantial deep EGS resource headroom.

Screening Methodology, Parameters & Limitations

This screening assessment for Mongolia is generated from Geothermal Radar Data Pack 2026.1 utilizing global 0.1° hex-grid thermal inversion across 17 379 model cells (land area: 1 564 116 km²). Baseline prospective criterion is defined as reaching 185°C at or above 5.5 km depth with surface temperature normalized to 15°C.

  • Screening estimates represent regional-scale heat in place and do not replace localized 3D seismic or exploratory drilling.
  • Model uncertainties expand in regions with sparse deep boreholes and complex thrust fault kinematics.
  • Grid proximity indicators reflect line-of-sight distance to high-voltage transmission and do not account for local substation thermal capacity.
Need Detailed Asset-Level Due Diligence?

Access 3D temperature grids, drilling cost curves, and micro-siting GIS layers.

Request Full Technical Dossier