FJ Asia Pacific Updated 2026-08-20

Fiji Geothermal Screening

Geothermal screening assessment identifies 38.1% prospective land reaching 185°C by 5.5 km depth in Fiji.

Key Geothermal Metrics

Land Reaching 185°C by 5.5 km High Potential
38.1%

Primary baseline screening criterion

Shallowest Depth to 200°C Very Shallow
2.9 km

Minimum drill depth for high enthalpy

Peak Temperature at 5 km Depth Commercial EGS
270.7 °C

Maximum modeled temperature

Typical Geothermal Gradient Volcanic / Rift
56.3 °C/km

Average to 5 km depth (15°C surface)

Grid Connectable Prospective Area Moderate Distance
70.6%

Hot territory within 50 km transmission

Stored Heat In-Place (3–7 km) 1 ZJ = 10²¹ Joules
11 ZJ

Thermal volume in place (>80°C baseline)

Depth vs. Temperature Matrix (% Land Area)

Proportion of national territory exceeding target isotherm at specified depth

0.1° Inversion Grid
Isotherm 3.0 km 4.0 km 5.0 km 6.0 km 7.0 km 8.0 km
150°C 10.2% 22.1% 41.6% 49.3% 62% 93%
175°C 8.3% 17.9% 33.2% 44.4% 60.1% 74.5%
200°C 9.9% 16.7% 26% 36.2% 44.8% 60.9%
225°C 6.1% 12.7% 23.7% 28% 39.6% 42%
250°C 5.5% 9.3% 17% 23.1% 28.6% 36.1%

4-Stage Geothermal Resource & Infrastructure Funnel

Progressive screening from gross national territory down to grid-connected & populated prospective zones

1 Whole country
18 274 km² 100%
2 Reaches 185°C by 5.5 km
6 962 km² 38.1%
3 ...and within 50 km transmission
4 915 km² 26.9%
4 ...and within 100 km town
4 456 km² 24.1%

Geological Setting & Subsurface Parameters

Lithology, basement thickness, stress and thermal boundary constraints

Median Depth to 200°C Isotherm 4.7 km
Best 10th Percentile Depth to 200°C 4 km
Median Temperature at 5 km Depth 201.9 °C
Best 10th Percentile Temp at 5 km 256.9 °C
Median Sediment Thickness 0.5 km
Sediment / Hard-Rock Well Share 18.7%
Territory Under 1 km Sediment Cover 88.1%
Lithostatic Pressure at 5 km Depth 130.7 MPa
Moho Crustal Discontinuity Depth 34.9 km
Thermal Lithosphere Thickness 99.1 km
Curie Temperature Isotherm Depth 18.2 km
Model Temperature Spread Uncertainty (200°C) ±0.7 km

Transmission Grid & Demand Colocation

Infrastructure interconnectivity and urban power demand proximity

High-Voltage Transmission Network Length 4 562 km
Land Area Within 25 km of Grid 53.7%
Land Area Within 50 km of Grid 70.6%
Land Area Within 100 km of Grid 78.8%
Average Proximity to Nearest Substation / Line 19.7 km
Urban Centers (>10,000 Population) 49
Total Urban Population 4.7 M
Prospective Resource Colocated Near Demand (>1M Pop) 57.6%

Target Sensitivity & Deep EGS Upside

Sensitivity of prospective resource area to adjusted depth and temperature thresholds

150°C Baseline at 5.5 km 61% of national territory reaches 150°C at 5.5 km depth
185°C Baseline at 7.5 km 68.6% of national territory reaches 185°C at 7.5 km depth

Global Peer Benchmarking (vs. 278 Assessed Jurisdictions)

Relative ranking distribution of Fiji across 11 standardized geothermal indicators

Fiji Rank Global Peer Spread
Shallowest 200°C depth
2.9 km Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 73th percentile
Peak temp at 5 km
270.7 °C Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 68th percentile
Prospective land area (>185°C at 5.5 km)
38.1% Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 64th percentile
Stored heat in-place (3-7 km)
11 ZJ Lower 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 33th percentile
Typical geothermal gradient
56.3 °C/km Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 80th percentile
Grid proximity (<50 km)
70.6% Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 71th percentile
Thin sediment coverage (<1 km)
88.1% Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 88th percentile
Curie isotherm depth
18.2 km Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 60th percentile
Moho crustal thickness
34.9 km Lower 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 37th percentile
Model temperature uncertainty spread
±1.3 km Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 51th percentile
Urban demand colocation
64.2% Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 78th percentile
Asset-Level 3D Simulation Available

Need Interactive 3D Spatial Inversion for Fiji?

High-resolution 3D temperature cubes, localized Curie depth inversions, fault network stress tensors, and drilling capex curves for Fiji are accessible through our Premium & Enterprise subscription tiers.

Direct Founder Contact: founders@geothermalradar.com

Analytical Geothermal Assessment & Discussion: Fiji

Subsurface thermal interpretation, model uncertainty, infrastructure colocation, and resource quality analysis

Resource Overview

Geothermal assessment for Fiji indicates volcanic_arc geological controls governing subsurface heat transport, yielding 38.1% of land area reaching the baseline target of 185°C at 5.5 km depth.

Uncertainty & Model Variance

Thermal inversion across Fiji shows consistent model convergence with constrained standard deviations across deep crustal layers.

Grid & Infrastructure Colocation

National electrical transmission coverage positions approximately 70.6% of prospective geothermal ground within 50 km of existing high-voltage corridors.

Geological & Basement Setting

Subsurface lithology is characterized by volcanic arc dynamics with median sediment thickness of 0.5 km and crustal thickness of 34.9 km.

Stored Heat Volume

Accessible thermal energy in place between 3 km and 7 km depth above 80°C totals 11 Zettajoules (ZJ).

Peer Comparison

Benchmarked against 237 global assessment jurisdictions, Fiji demonstrates competitive positioning across heat flow, infrastructure, and basement competence indicators.

Target Sensitivity Analysis

Screening at 150°C baseline at 5.5 km increases prospective territory, demonstrating substantial deep EGS resource headroom.

Screening Methodology, Parameters & Limitations

This screening assessment for Fiji is generated from Geothermal Radar Data Pack 2026.1 utilizing global 0.1° hex-grid thermal inversion across 203 model cells (land area: 18 274 km²). Baseline prospective criterion is defined as reaching 185°C at or above 5.5 km depth with surface temperature normalized to 15°C.

  • Screening estimates represent regional-scale heat in place and do not replace localized 3D seismic or exploratory drilling.
  • Model uncertainties expand in regions with sparse deep boreholes and complex thrust fault kinematics.
  • Grid proximity indicators reflect line-of-sight distance to high-voltage transmission and do not account for local substation thermal capacity.
Need Detailed Asset-Level Due Diligence?

Access 3D temperature grids, drilling cost curves, and micro-siting GIS layers.

Request Full Technical Dossier