BL South America Updated 2026-08-20

Saint Barthelemy Geothermal Screening

Geothermal screening assessment identifies 32.1% prospective land reaching 185°C by 5.5 km depth in Saint Barthelemy.

Key Geothermal Metrics

Land Reaching 185°C by 5.5 km High Potential
32.1%

Primary baseline screening criterion

Shallowest Depth to 200°C Shallow
3.4 km

Minimum drill depth for high enthalpy

Peak Temperature at 5 km Depth Superhot
334.1 °C

Maximum modeled temperature

Typical Geothermal Gradient Volcanic / Rift
59.3 °C/km

Average to 5 km depth (15°C surface)

Grid Connectable Prospective Area Moderate Distance
78%

Hot territory within 50 km transmission

Stored Heat In-Place (3–7 km) 1 ZJ = 10²¹ Joules
32.4 ZJ

Thermal volume in place (>80°C baseline)

Depth vs. Temperature Matrix (% Land Area)

Proportion of national territory exceeding target isotherm at specified depth

0.1° Inversion Grid
Isotherm 3.0 km 4.0 km 5.0 km 6.0 km 7.0 km 8.0 km
150°C 10.7% 27.7% 43.6% 63.4% 89.3% 89.3%
175°C 9.4% 24.6% 39.2% 51.6% 65.3% 95.5%
200°C 12.8% 21.4% 32.6% 51.3% 69.7% 84.6%
225°C 8.4% 18.6% 32.8% 39% 56.6% 67.9%
250°C 7.2% 16.2% 24.3% 38.2% 51.5% 59.2%

4-Stage Geothermal Resource & Infrastructure Funnel

Progressive screening from gross national territory down to grid-connected & populated prospective zones

1 Whole country
25 km² 100%
2 Reaches 185°C by 5.5 km
8 km² 32.1%
3 ...and within 50 km transmission
6 km² 25%
4 ...and within 100 km town
5 km² 23.2%

Geological Setting & Subsurface Parameters

Lithology, basement thickness, stress and thermal boundary constraints

Median Depth to 200°C Isotherm 5.3 km
Best 10th Percentile Depth to 200°C 4.4 km
Median Temperature at 5 km Depth 222.9 °C
Best 10th Percentile Temp at 5 km 299.1 °C
Median Sediment Thickness 0.4 km
Sediment / Hard-Rock Well Share 21%
Territory Under 1 km Sediment Cover 82.4%
Lithostatic Pressure at 5 km Depth 131.2 MPa
Moho Crustal Discontinuity Depth 45.2 km
Thermal Lithosphere Thickness 123 km
Curie Temperature Isotherm Depth 16.1 km
Model Temperature Spread Uncertainty (200°C) ±1 km

Transmission Grid & Demand Colocation

Infrastructure interconnectivity and urban power demand proximity

High-Voltage Transmission Network Length 114 km
Land Area Within 25 km of Grid 61.9%
Land Area Within 50 km of Grid 78%
Land Area Within 100 km of Grid 85.7%
Average Proximity to Nearest Substation / Line 31.1 km
Urban Centers (>10,000 Population) 5
Total Urban Population 0.2 M
Prospective Resource Colocated Near Demand (>1M Pop) 72.6%

Target Sensitivity & Deep EGS Upside

Sensitivity of prospective resource area to adjusted depth and temperature thresholds

150°C Baseline at 5.5 km 51.4% of national territory reaches 150°C at 5.5 km depth
185°C Baseline at 7.5 km 57.8% of national territory reaches 185°C at 7.5 km depth

Global Peer Benchmarking (vs. 278 Assessed Jurisdictions)

Relative ranking distribution of Saint Barthelemy across 11 standardized geothermal indicators

Saint Barthelemy Rank Global Peer Spread
Shallowest 200°C depth
3.4 km Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 66th percentile
Peak temp at 5 km
334.1 °C Top 10%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 94th percentile
Prospective land area (>185°C at 5.5 km)
32.1% Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 54th percentile
Stored heat in-place (3-7 km)
32.4 ZJ Lower 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 47th percentile
Typical geothermal gradient
59.3 °C/km Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 85th percentile
Grid proximity (<50 km)
78% Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 78th percentile
Thin sediment coverage (<1 km)
82.4% Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 82th percentile
Curie isotherm depth
16.1 km Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 65th percentile
Moho crustal thickness
45.2 km Lower 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 19th percentile
Model temperature uncertainty spread
±1.5 km Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 75th percentile
Urban demand colocation
80% Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 76th percentile
Asset-Level 3D Simulation Available

Need Interactive 3D Spatial Inversion for Saint Barthelemy?

High-resolution 3D temperature cubes, localized Curie depth inversions, fault network stress tensors, and drilling capex curves for Saint Barthelemy are accessible through our Premium & Enterprise subscription tiers.

Direct Founder Contact: founders@geothermalradar.com

Analytical Geothermal Assessment & Discussion: Saint Barthelemy

Subsurface thermal interpretation, model uncertainty, infrastructure colocation, and resource quality analysis

Resource Overview

Geothermal assessment for Saint Barthelemy indicates volcanic_arc geological controls governing subsurface heat transport, yielding 32.1% of land area reaching the baseline target of 185°C at 5.5 km depth.

Uncertainty & Model Variance

Thermal inversion across Saint Barthelemy shows consistent model convergence with constrained standard deviations across deep crustal layers.

Grid & Infrastructure Colocation

National electrical transmission coverage positions approximately 78% of prospective geothermal ground within 50 km of existing high-voltage corridors.

Geological & Basement Setting

Subsurface lithology is characterized by volcanic arc dynamics with median sediment thickness of 0.4 km and crustal thickness of 45.2 km.

Stored Heat Volume

Accessible thermal energy in place between 3 km and 7 km depth above 80°C totals 32.4 Zettajoules (ZJ).

Peer Comparison

Benchmarked against 237 global assessment jurisdictions, Saint Barthelemy demonstrates competitive positioning across heat flow, infrastructure, and basement competence indicators.

Target Sensitivity Analysis

Screening at 150°C baseline at 5.5 km increases prospective territory, demonstrating substantial deep EGS resource headroom.

Screening Methodology, Parameters & Limitations

This screening assessment for Saint Barthelemy is generated from Geothermal Radar Data Pack 2026.1 utilizing global 0.1° hex-grid thermal inversion across 1 model cells (land area: 25 km²). Baseline prospective criterion is defined as reaching 185°C at or above 5.5 km depth with surface temperature normalized to 15°C.

  • Screening estimates represent regional-scale heat in place and do not replace localized 3D seismic or exploratory drilling.
  • Model uncertainties expand in regions with sparse deep boreholes and complex thrust fault kinematics.
  • Grid proximity indicators reflect line-of-sight distance to high-voltage transmission and do not account for local substation thermal capacity.
Need Detailed Asset-Level Due Diligence?

Access 3D temperature grids, drilling cost curves, and micro-siting GIS layers.

Request Full Technical Dossier