NO Europe Updated 2026-08-20

Norway Geothermal Screening

Geothermal screening assessment identifies 5.5% prospective land reaching 185°C by 5.5 km depth in Norway.

Key Geothermal Metrics

Land Reaching 185°C by 5.5 km Low Prospect
5.5%

Primary baseline screening criterion

Shallowest Depth to 200°C Deep Target
6.3 km

Minimum drill depth for high enthalpy

Peak Temperature at 5 km Depth Direct Heat
147.4 °C

Maximum modeled temperature

Typical Geothermal Gradient Continental Normal
25 °C/km

Average to 5 km depth (15°C surface)

Grid Connectable Prospective Area Moderate Distance
76.1%

Hot territory within 50 km transmission

Stored Heat In-Place (3–7 km) 1 ZJ = 10²¹ Joules
29.7 ZJ

Thermal volume in place (>80°C baseline)

Depth vs. Temperature Matrix (% Land Area)

Proportion of national territory exceeding target isotherm at specified depth

0.1° Inversion Grid
Isotherm 3.0 km 4.0 km 5.0 km 6.0 km 7.0 km 8.0 km
150°C 0.4% 0.9% 1.6% 2.2% 2.5% 3.5%
175°C 0.3% 0.5% 0.7% 1.1% 1.5% 1.6%
200°C
225°C
250°C

4-Stage Geothermal Resource & Infrastructure Funnel

Progressive screening from gross national territory down to grid-connected & populated prospective zones

1 Whole country
385 207 km² 100%
2 Reaches 185°C by 5.5 km
21 186 km² 5.5%
3 ...and within 50 km transmission
16 123 km² 4.2%
4 ...and within 100 km town
14 517 km² 4%

Geological Setting & Subsurface Parameters

Lithology, basement thickness, stress and thermal boundary constraints

Median Depth to 200°C Isotherm 8.4 km
Best 10th Percentile Depth to 200°C 7.3 km
Median Temperature at 5 km Depth 110.1 °C
Best 10th Percentile Temp at 5 km 130.3 °C
Median Sediment Thickness 0.6 km
Sediment / Hard-Rock Well Share 18.9%
Territory Under 1 km Sediment Cover 94.6%
Lithostatic Pressure at 5 km Depth 134.7 MPa
Moho Crustal Discontinuity Depth 42.7 km
Thermal Lithosphere Thickness 124.6 km
Curie Temperature Isotherm Depth 37.3 km
Model Temperature Spread Uncertainty (200°C) ±1.5 km

Transmission Grid & Demand Colocation

Infrastructure interconnectivity and urban power demand proximity

High-Voltage Transmission Network Length 25 710 km
Land Area Within 25 km of Grid 59.7%
Land Area Within 50 km of Grid 76.1%
Land Area Within 100 km of Grid 83.4%
Average Proximity to Nearest Substation / Line 33.8 km
Urban Centers (>10,000 Population) 195
Total Urban Population 17.1 M
Prospective Resource Colocated Near Demand (>1M Pop) 23.7%

Target Sensitivity & Deep EGS Upside

Sensitivity of prospective resource area to adjusted depth and temperature thresholds

150°C Baseline at 5.5 km 8.8% of national territory reaches 150°C at 5.5 km depth
185°C Baseline at 7.5 km 9.9% of national territory reaches 185°C at 7.5 km depth

Global Peer Benchmarking (vs. 278 Assessed Jurisdictions)

Relative ranking distribution of Norway across 11 standardized geothermal indicators

Norway Rank Global Peer Spread
Shallowest 200°C depth
6.3 km Lower 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 24th percentile
Peak temp at 5 km
147.4 °C Lower 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 19th percentile
Prospective land area (>185°C at 5.5 km)
5.5% Lower 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 9th percentile
Stored heat in-place (3-7 km)
29.7 ZJ Lower 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 46th percentile
Typical geothermal gradient
25 °C/km Lower 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 36th percentile
Grid proximity (<50 km)
76.1% Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 76th percentile
Thin sediment coverage (<1 km)
94.6% Top 10%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 95th percentile
Curie isotherm depth
37.3 km Lower 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 18th percentile
Moho crustal thickness
42.7 km Lower 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 23th percentile
Model temperature uncertainty spread
±1.2 km Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 45th percentile
Urban demand colocation
50.1% Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 63th percentile
Asset-Level 3D Simulation Available

Need Interactive 3D Spatial Inversion for Norway?

High-resolution 3D temperature cubes, localized Curie depth inversions, fault network stress tensors, and drilling capex curves for Norway are accessible through our Premium & Enterprise subscription tiers.

Direct Founder Contact: founders@geothermalradar.com

Analytical Geothermal Assessment & Discussion: Norway

Subsurface thermal interpretation, model uncertainty, infrastructure colocation, and resource quality analysis

Resource Overview

Geothermal assessment for Norway indicates craton_shield geological controls governing subsurface heat transport, yielding 5.5% of land area reaching the baseline target of 185°C at 5.5 km depth.

Uncertainty & Model Variance

Thermal inversion across Norway shows consistent model convergence with constrained standard deviations across deep crustal layers.

Grid & Infrastructure Colocation

National electrical transmission coverage positions approximately 76.1% of prospective geothermal ground within 50 km of existing high-voltage corridors.

Geological & Basement Setting

Subsurface lithology is characterized by craton shield dynamics with median sediment thickness of 0.6 km and crustal thickness of 42.7 km.

Stored Heat Volume

Accessible thermal energy in place between 3 km and 7 km depth above 80°C totals 29.7 Zettajoules (ZJ).

Peer Comparison

Benchmarked against 237 global assessment jurisdictions, Norway demonstrates competitive positioning across heat flow, infrastructure, and basement competence indicators.

Target Sensitivity Analysis

Screening at 150°C baseline at 5.5 km increases prospective territory, demonstrating substantial deep EGS resource headroom.

Screening Methodology, Parameters & Limitations

This screening assessment for Norway is generated from Geothermal Radar Data Pack 2026.1 utilizing global 0.1° hex-grid thermal inversion across 4 280 model cells (land area: 385 207 km²). Baseline prospective criterion is defined as reaching 185°C at or above 5.5 km depth with surface temperature normalized to 15°C.

  • Screening estimates represent regional-scale heat in place and do not replace localized 3D seismic or exploratory drilling.
  • Model uncertainties expand in regions with sparse deep boreholes and complex thrust fault kinematics.
  • Grid proximity indicators reflect line-of-sight distance to high-voltage transmission and do not account for local substation thermal capacity.
Need Detailed Asset-Level Due Diligence?

Access 3D temperature grids, drilling cost curves, and micro-siting GIS layers.

Request Full Technical Dossier