LT Europe Updated 2026-08-20

Lithuania Geothermal Screening

Geothermal screening assessment identifies 14.8% prospective land reaching 185°C by 5.5 km depth in Lithuania.

Key Geothermal Metrics

Land Reaching 185°C by 5.5 km Moderate
14.8%

Primary baseline screening criterion

Shallowest Depth to 200°C Deep Target
5.2 km

Minimum drill depth for high enthalpy

Peak Temperature at 5 km Depth Direct Heat
179.3 °C

Maximum modeled temperature

Typical Geothermal Gradient Continental Normal
28.7 °C/km

Average to 5 km depth (15°C surface)

Grid Connectable Prospective Area High Accessibility
96.3%

Hot territory within 50 km transmission

Stored Heat In-Place (3–7 km) 1 ZJ = 10²¹ Joules
14 ZJ

Thermal volume in place (>80°C baseline)

Depth vs. Temperature Matrix (% Land Area)

Proportion of national territory exceeding target isotherm at specified depth

0.1° Inversion Grid
Isotherm 3.0 km 4.0 km 5.0 km 6.0 km 7.0 km 8.0 km
150°C 2.1% 4.3% 6.4% 8.7% 13.4% 14.8%
175°C 1.7% 3.1% 4.4% 7.4% 8.1% 10.5%
200°C 0.6% 1.8% 2.8% 3.8% 4.7% 5%
225°C 0.1% 0.3% 0.4% 0.5% 0.6% 0.8%
250°C

4-Stage Geothermal Resource & Infrastructure Funnel

Progressive screening from gross national territory down to grid-connected & populated prospective zones

1 Whole country
65 300 km² 100%
2 Reaches 185°C by 5.5 km
9 664 km² 14.8%
3 ...and within 50 km transmission
9 306 km² 14.3%
4 ...and within 100 km town
8 405 km² 13.2%

Geological Setting & Subsurface Parameters

Lithology, basement thickness, stress and thermal boundary constraints

Median Depth to 200°C Isotherm 7.2 km
Best 10th Percentile Depth to 200°C 6 km
Median Temperature at 5 km Depth 126 °C
Best 10th Percentile Temp at 5 km 158.1 °C
Median Sediment Thickness 3.1 km
Sediment / Hard-Rock Well Share 27.5%
Territory Under 1 km Sediment Cover 17.7%
Lithostatic Pressure at 5 km Depth 136.7 MPa
Moho Crustal Discontinuity Depth 33.8 km
Thermal Lithosphere Thickness 94.5 km
Curie Temperature Isotherm Depth 28.4 km
Model Temperature Spread Uncertainty (200°C) ±1.6 km

Transmission Grid & Demand Colocation

Infrastructure interconnectivity and urban power demand proximity

High-Voltage Transmission Network Length 6 319 km
Land Area Within 25 km of Grid 79%
Land Area Within 50 km of Grid 96.3%
Land Area Within 100 km of Grid 99.5%
Average Proximity to Nearest Substation / Line 15.6 km
Urban Centers (>10,000 Population) 60
Total Urban Population 4.4 M
Prospective Resource Colocated Near Demand (>1M Pop) 29%

Target Sensitivity & Deep EGS Upside

Sensitivity of prospective resource area to adjusted depth and temperature thresholds

150°C Baseline at 5.5 km 23.7% of national territory reaches 150°C at 5.5 km depth
185°C Baseline at 7.5 km 26.6% of national territory reaches 185°C at 7.5 km depth

Global Peer Benchmarking (vs. 278 Assessed Jurisdictions)

Relative ranking distribution of Lithuania across 11 standardized geothermal indicators

Lithuania Rank Global Peer Spread
Shallowest 200°C depth
5.2 km Lower 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 40th percentile
Peak temp at 5 km
179.3 °C Lower 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 32th percentile
Prospective land area (>185°C at 5.5 km)
14.8% Lower 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 25th percentile
Stored heat in-place (3-7 km)
14 ZJ Lower 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 36th percentile
Typical geothermal gradient
28.7 °C/km Lower 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 41th percentile
Grid proximity (<50 km)
96.3% Top 10%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 96th percentile
Thin sediment coverage (<1 km)
17.7% Lower 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 18th percentile
Curie isotherm depth
28.4 km Lower 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 38th percentile
Moho crustal thickness
33.8 km Lower 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 39th percentile
Model temperature uncertainty spread
±1.5 km Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 77th percentile
Urban demand colocation
63.3% Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 76th percentile
Asset-Level 3D Simulation Available

Need Interactive 3D Spatial Inversion for Lithuania?

High-resolution 3D temperature cubes, localized Curie depth inversions, fault network stress tensors, and drilling capex curves for Lithuania are accessible through our Premium & Enterprise subscription tiers.

Direct Founder Contact: founders@geothermalradar.com

Analytical Geothermal Assessment & Discussion: Lithuania

Subsurface thermal interpretation, model uncertainty, infrastructure colocation, and resource quality analysis

Resource Overview

Geothermal assessment for Lithuania indicates sedimentary_rift geological controls governing subsurface heat transport, yielding 14.8% of land area reaching the baseline target of 185°C at 5.5 km depth.

Uncertainty & Model Variance

Thermal inversion across Lithuania shows consistent model convergence with constrained standard deviations across deep crustal layers.

Grid & Infrastructure Colocation

National electrical transmission coverage positions approximately 96.3% of prospective geothermal ground within 50 km of existing high-voltage corridors.

Geological & Basement Setting

Subsurface lithology is characterized by sedimentary rift dynamics with median sediment thickness of 3.1 km and crustal thickness of 33.8 km.

Stored Heat Volume

Accessible thermal energy in place between 3 km and 7 km depth above 80°C totals 14 Zettajoules (ZJ).

Peer Comparison

Benchmarked against 237 global assessment jurisdictions, Lithuania demonstrates competitive positioning across heat flow, infrastructure, and basement competence indicators.

Target Sensitivity Analysis

Screening at 150°C baseline at 5.5 km increases prospective territory, demonstrating substantial deep EGS resource headroom.

Screening Methodology, Parameters & Limitations

This screening assessment for Lithuania is generated from Geothermal Radar Data Pack 2026.1 utilizing global 0.1° hex-grid thermal inversion across 726 model cells (land area: 65 300 km²). Baseline prospective criterion is defined as reaching 185°C at or above 5.5 km depth with surface temperature normalized to 15°C.

  • Screening estimates represent regional-scale heat in place and do not replace localized 3D seismic or exploratory drilling.
  • Model uncertainties expand in regions with sparse deep boreholes and complex thrust fault kinematics.
  • Grid proximity indicators reflect line-of-sight distance to high-voltage transmission and do not account for local substation thermal capacity.
Need Detailed Asset-Level Due Diligence?

Access 3D temperature grids, drilling cost curves, and micro-siting GIS layers.

Request Full Technical Dossier