BY Europe Updated 2026-08-20

Belarus Geothermal Screening

Geothermal screening assessment identifies 5.7% prospective land reaching 185°C by 5.5 km depth in Belarus.

Key Geothermal Metrics

Land Reaching 185°C by 5.5 km Low Prospect
5.7%

Primary baseline screening criterion

Shallowest Depth to 200°C Deep Target
6.1 km

Minimum drill depth for high enthalpy

Peak Temperature at 5 km Depth Direct Heat
148.9 °C

Maximum modeled temperature

Typical Geothermal Gradient Continental Normal
24 °C/km

Average to 5 km depth (15°C surface)

Grid Connectable Prospective Area Moderate Distance
72.5%

Hot territory within 50 km transmission

Stored Heat In-Place (3–7 km) 1 ZJ = 10²¹ Joules
26.5 ZJ

Thermal volume in place (>80°C baseline)

Depth vs. Temperature Matrix (% Land Area)

Proportion of national territory exceeding target isotherm at specified depth

0.1° Inversion Grid
Isotherm 3.0 km 4.0 km 5.0 km 6.0 km 7.0 km 8.0 km
150°C 0.6% 1.1% 1.8% 2.1% 3.1% 3.7%
175°C 0.2% 0.5% 0.8% 1.2% 1.5% 1.9%
200°C
225°C
250°C

4-Stage Geothermal Resource & Infrastructure Funnel

Progressive screening from gross national territory down to grid-connected & populated prospective zones

1 Whole country
207 600 km² 100%
2 Reaches 185°C by 5.5 km
11 833 km² 5.7%
3 ...and within 50 km transmission
8 579 km² 4.1%
4 ...and within 100 km town
7 477 km² 3.7%

Geological Setting & Subsurface Parameters

Lithology, basement thickness, stress and thermal boundary constraints

Median Depth to 200°C Isotherm 9.1 km
Best 10th Percentile Depth to 200°C 6.8 km
Median Temperature at 5 km Depth 101 °C
Best 10th Percentile Temp at 5 km 140.5 °C
Median Sediment Thickness 0.6 km
Sediment / Hard-Rock Well Share 25.3%
Territory Under 1 km Sediment Cover 85.6%
Lithostatic Pressure at 5 km Depth 132.7 MPa
Moho Crustal Discontinuity Depth 42.6 km
Thermal Lithosphere Thickness 113.1 km
Curie Temperature Isotherm Depth 34.7 km
Model Temperature Spread Uncertainty (200°C) ±1.5 km

Transmission Grid & Demand Colocation

Infrastructure interconnectivity and urban power demand proximity

High-Voltage Transmission Network Length 8 396 km
Land Area Within 25 km of Grid 58%
Land Area Within 50 km of Grid 72.5%
Land Area Within 100 km of Grid 85.5%
Average Proximity to Nearest Substation / Line 14.3 km
Urban Centers (>10,000 Population) 79
Total Urban Population 15.3 M
Prospective Resource Colocated Near Demand (>1M Pop) 38.3%

Target Sensitivity & Deep EGS Upside

Sensitivity of prospective resource area to adjusted depth and temperature thresholds

150°C Baseline at 5.5 km 9.1% of national territory reaches 150°C at 5.5 km depth
185°C Baseline at 7.5 km 10.3% of national territory reaches 185°C at 7.5 km depth

Global Peer Benchmarking (vs. 278 Assessed Jurisdictions)

Relative ranking distribution of Belarus across 11 standardized geothermal indicators

Belarus Rank Global Peer Spread
Shallowest 200°C depth
6.1 km Lower 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 27th percentile
Peak temp at 5 km
148.9 °C Lower 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 20th percentile
Prospective land area (>185°C at 5.5 km)
5.7% Lower 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 10th percentile
Stored heat in-place (3-7 km)
26.5 ZJ Lower 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 44th percentile
Typical geothermal gradient
24 °C/km Lower 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 34th percentile
Grid proximity (<50 km)
72.5% Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 72th percentile
Thin sediment coverage (<1 km)
85.6% Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 86th percentile
Curie isotherm depth
34.7 km Lower 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 24th percentile
Moho crustal thickness
42.6 km Lower 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 23th percentile
Model temperature uncertainty spread
±0.7 km Middle 50%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 79th percentile
Urban demand colocation
57.1% Top 25%
P0 (Lowest) P50 (Median) P100 (Highest) • 72th percentile
Asset-Level 3D Simulation Available

Need Interactive 3D Spatial Inversion for Belarus?

High-resolution 3D temperature cubes, localized Curie depth inversions, fault network stress tensors, and drilling capex curves for Belarus are accessible through our Premium & Enterprise subscription tiers.

Direct Founder Contact: founders@geothermalradar.com

Analytical Geothermal Assessment & Discussion: Belarus

Subsurface thermal interpretation, model uncertainty, infrastructure colocation, and resource quality analysis

Resource Overview

Geothermal assessment for Belarus indicates craton_shield geological controls governing subsurface heat transport, yielding 5.7% of land area reaching the baseline target of 185°C at 5.5 km depth.

Uncertainty & Model Variance

Thermal inversion across Belarus shows consistent model convergence with constrained standard deviations across deep crustal layers.

Grid & Infrastructure Colocation

National electrical transmission coverage positions approximately 72.5% of prospective geothermal ground within 50 km of existing high-voltage corridors.

Geological & Basement Setting

Subsurface lithology is characterized by craton shield dynamics with median sediment thickness of 0.6 km and crustal thickness of 42.6 km.

Stored Heat Volume

Accessible thermal energy in place between 3 km and 7 km depth above 80°C totals 26.5 Zettajoules (ZJ).

Peer Comparison

Benchmarked against 237 global assessment jurisdictions, Belarus demonstrates competitive positioning across heat flow, infrastructure, and basement competence indicators.

Target Sensitivity Analysis

Screening at 150°C baseline at 5.5 km increases prospective territory, demonstrating substantial deep EGS resource headroom.

Screening Methodology, Parameters & Limitations

This screening assessment for Belarus is generated from Geothermal Radar Data Pack 2026.1 utilizing global 0.1° hex-grid thermal inversion across 2 307 model cells (land area: 207 600 km²). Baseline prospective criterion is defined as reaching 185°C at or above 5.5 km depth with surface temperature normalized to 15°C.

  • Screening estimates represent regional-scale heat in place and do not replace localized 3D seismic or exploratory drilling.
  • Model uncertainties expand in regions with sparse deep boreholes and complex thrust fault kinematics.
  • Grid proximity indicators reflect line-of-sight distance to high-voltage transmission and do not account for local substation thermal capacity.
Need Detailed Asset-Level Due Diligence?

Access 3D temperature grids, drilling cost curves, and micro-siting GIS layers.

Request Full Technical Dossier